Welcome to 3sixty News and Views Sign in | Join | Help

BrokerBlog

Brokers: Can (should) you enforce carrier safety?

In a recent survey of trucking companies monitored by CarrierWatch, TransCore’s powerful carrier monitoring system, we found the following:

·         74 percent have never received a safety rating

·         20 percent of awarded safety ratings are more than ten years old

·         More than 43 percent of carriers with a satisfactory safety rating have at least one deficient SEA score in SAFESTAT

·         More than 160 authorized freight carriers have an unsatisfactory safety rating…sometimes for as long as ten years

 

A couple of years ago, when brokers were having a tough time finding carriers, it was hard to turn down an available carrier, even one with a conditional rating. These days, however, a broker can be choosier. Once a broker has an accurate—and up to date—picture of a carrier’s record, we think the choice to hire or not hire becomes pretty clear.

 

The government isn’t tough enough on carriers that violate safety laws, said Rep. Jim Oberstar (D-MN), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, citing a recent U.S. GAO report on the effectiveness of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). According to that report, carriers with serious safety violations might be reported on FMCSA’s SAFESTAT system, but only about 20 percent received the mandated fines in 2006.

 

Oberstar’s accusations have gotten a lot of industry press, as articles in The Trucker, Transport Topics and elsewhere demonstrate. Politicians have called for the FMCSA to clean up its act and enforce federal statutes.

 

Obviously, we applaud efforts to enforce good transportation safety practices. But it’s also important to keep in mind that the main purpose of a fine is to deter would-be violators. If an unscrupulous carrier can greatly increase profits by cutting a few corners, the cost of a fine might well be considered a minor cost of doing business, i.e., not much of a deterrent.

 

Yet if brokers stop using problem carriers, at least part of the problem will solve itself. Safety and operating authority information is available to the public—if the broker knows where to look. The threat of losing business is a pretty strong deterrent, and if carriers know a broker intends to enforce compliance—and has the means to check up on violations—carriers are more likely to comply.

 

As our October Broker of the Month, Dennis Baxter, says, brokers are “lunatics if they don’t do carrier background checks.” Baxter’s company, National Carriers, uses CarrierWatch as part of their carrier development program. (For more on how National Carriers benefits from CarrierWatch, read Baxter’s Broker of the Month profile.)

 

A lot can happen to a carrier who had a stellar rating six months ago. Every week (on average), the CarrierWatch team updates its database with the following FMCSA carrier changes:

·         900 new authorizations

·         50 revocations or reinstatements

·         275 carriers put on 30-day notice

·         300 changes to BIPD and/or cargo insurance status

·         100 name changes

·         More than 100 phone or fax number changes

 

(To learn more about how CarrierWatch can protect your business, and get your free CarrierWatch audit, visit our CarrierWatch page.) 

 

Should the FMCSA be held responsible for keeping problem carriers off the road? Yes…but if the carrier’s involved in an accident while hauling your load, you’ll be the one paying the lawyers. In our opinion, brokers can best protect themselves by ensuring that they’re using top-notch carriers to begin with.

 

In the long run, self-enforcement is usually the best, and least expensive, option. Does your firm do anything special to reinforce good carrier practices? Take our survey, and let us know…or post a comment below.

 

Published Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:13 PM by Editor

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Anne Chalmers said:

I agree, fines are not effective deterrents.

November 7, 2007 9:32 AM
 

BrokerBlog said:

Brokers who don’t exercise “due diligence” by thoroughly investigating carriers before hiring them could

December 19, 2007 12:28 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit